Pupils per Master in BC Application

There is a way to view the amount of pupils per master in any given data folder using the BC application itself. What I mean is when you run BC, it will show at the bottom the number of pupils per master in the entire database. Does anyone know how to do that? I know two people are aware of this, but they are both TOO secretive to tell me.

If anyone else knows, please post here or send me a PM.

Thanks :)

it's possible with BC decrypter with function get Master

w13winni wrote:

it's possible with BC decrypter with function get Master

Yes but with the masters shown in BC, it is MUCH faster and an easier visual.

yes but its not possible with BC^^

w13winni wrote:

yes but its not possible with BC^^

Yes it is... i know two people who know how to do it and I have seen pictures of it as well

Yaboirobby wrote:

w13winni wrote:

yes but its not possible with BC^^

Yes it is... i know two people who know how to do it and I have seen pictures of it as well

u got some of the pics?

xteenager wrote:

Yaboirobby wrote:

w13winni wrote:

yes but its not possible with BC^^

Yes it is... i know two people who know how to do it and I have seen pictures of it as well

u got some of the pics?

No, they were removed by Luminous cause M4 didn't want people knowing how he got BC to show masters. There is evidence on argus's thread though.

oh, i remember those pics

lol, just fake picture

i will ask at BC's creators

w13winni wrote:

lol, just fake picture

i will ask at BC's creators

Trust me... it's not fake. There are others who do it too... BC creators may not know either cause Im pretty sure you have to go into BC and config it somehow to show the masters.

who other than mayhem have this

and w13inni, u got a pm mate hope i get a reply, despite the answer

xteenager wrote:

who other than mayhem have this

and w13inni, u got a pm mate hope i get a reply, despite the answer

Well, i wont tell cause they probably don't want PM's asking how to work it so....

not gonna pm, just asking for names, nvm then

so this is supposed to be a program that records text on the screen and converts it into a text document?



I don't know how QTP does it, but it is able to get text from the screen, using the innerhtml command or something... I don't know if it can then record what it sees into a txt document, but I'm sure it can, since it's such a powerful tool. I would guess you command it to focus on the bc window, and when it sees a line that includes "cree et enregistre pour maitre (xxx), it could copy that line and put it in text, so you would then know the pupil and master and be able to sort from there... you'd have to ask bob about that, 'cause I only learned a little about qtp before eumi came along with sql and the decrypter and made my running of IE6 to make qtp work obsolete

C'mon Robby, tell us who they are

Yaboirobby wrote:

w13winni wrote:

lol, just fake picture

i will ask at BC's creators

Trust me... it's not fake. There are others who do it too... BC creators may not know either cause Im pretty sure you have to go into BC and config it somehow to show the masters.

no way you can do that with BC out of the box. it doesn't even record the master of the brutes. This is by design, so you guys could not filter out the "unwanted" brutes too easily...
If they actually did a "brutes by master" function inside BC, they had to heavily modify BC, which would be quite remarquable : I'd say this is a hack (along the lines of what bambam suggests) or a fake.

From the outside looking in, I would believe it is possible somehow. When BC firsts creates a DB it's knows who to pupil(master). I would bet that same data is embedded in the DB somewhere.

Subman(R) wrote:

From the outside looking in, I would believe it is possible somehow. When BC firsts creates a DB it's knows who to pupil(master). I would bet that same data is embedded in the DB somewhere.

from the inside looking, believe me, it's not. again, it is possible to modify bc in order to store it, but this require actual java programming, not just messing around with configuration files.

That make sense, Thanks.

Robby, you're opening up a can of worms. I'm sure there is a valid reason why the two did not release any details. Otherwise, everyone and their mother will be able to modify BC and ruin it for the public. I'm sure if they can modify java to show the master, they'll be able to do a lot of other things...

BTW, I do not know who the two people are or how to modify the BC to show the masters.